ci: align pre-commit hooks and GitHub templates - #351
Conversation
Adopt the shared pre-commit baseline: two-line SPDX header, conventional commit message validation (commit-msg stage), and the centralized add-license / add-spdx-license hooks from developer_tools v0.2.0. Run pre-commit CI only on files modified by the PR, and roll out the standard issue templates and the simplified single PR template. TRI-1100
Legal's Copyright / License Header Guidance specifies the SPDX form without a comma after the year. TRI-1100
Org-wide label color scheme and cherry-pick detection. TRI-1100
Human-readable type labels with enforced descriptions and colors. TRI-1100
The add-license hook now fails when the LICENSE copyright year is stale. TRI-1100
Workflow files are license-processed again (only templates excluded); refresh the stale copyright year this repo's pre-commit workflow carried. TRI-1100
Grant issues:write to the labeling job (review feedback). TRI-1100
Greptile SummaryThis PR aligns the repository with the org-wide CI/CD baseline consolidated in
Confidence Score: 5/5Safe to merge — changes are confined to CI configuration and issue templates with no production code touched. All changes are CI/tooling configuration. The pull_request_target pattern is implemented correctly with a mutex if condition and minimal permissions. The flake8 arg fix and hook migration are straightforward. The only nit is the unpinned pre-commit binary version on cache misses, which does not affect correctness today. .github/workflows/pre-commit.yml — the pre-commit binary version is not pinned; consider pinning to avoid unexpected breakage on cache misses. Important Files Changed
Flowchart%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
PR[Pull Request opened / edited / synchronize / reopened]
PR --> PC_trigger[pre-commit.yml triggered]
PR --> CP_trigger[conventional-pr.yml triggered]
CP_trigger --> same_repo{Same-repo PR?}
same_repo -- "pull_request event" --> CP_job[conventional-pr job]
same_repo -- "pull_request_target event" --> CP_job
CP_job --> reusable["triton-inference-server/.github conventional-pr.yml @ v1.4.3"]
reusable --> validate[Validate PR title vs Conventional Commits]
reusable --> label[Apply type label: ci / feat / fix]
reusable --> cherry[Detect cherry-picks]
PC_trigger --> checkout["actions/checkout@v5.0.0 fetch-depth: 2"]
checkout --> cache["actions/cache@v4 ~/.cache/pre-commit"]
cache --> pip["pip install pre-commit"]
pip --> diff["git diff --name-only -z --diff-filter=d HEAD^1 HEAD"]
diff --> xargs["xargs -0 --no-run-if-empty pre-commit run --files"]
xargs --> hooks["isort · black · flake8 · clang-format · codespell · pre-commit-hooks · add-license"]
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "ci: harden CI workflows and configs per ..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
| permissions: | ||
| pull-requests: write | ||
| issues: write | ||
| uses: triton-inference-server/.github/.github/workflows/conventional-pr.yml@v1.4.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version tag contradicts PR description
The workflow pins the reusable caller to @v1.4.2, but the PR description consistently references v1.4.1 (e.g. "pinned tags current: v1.4.1 — already exist, CI is green"). The same mismatch appears in .pre-commit-config.yaml at the add-license hook (rev: v1.4.2). If v1.4.2 is the intended final tag, the description should be updated; if v1.4.1 was intended, both files were bumped unintentionally.
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed - documentation drift: the descriptions have been refreshed to the current pinned tag v1.4.3 (they lagged behind the tag revisions; the tag exists and CI is green fleet-wide).
- conventional-pr stub: dual pull_request/pull_request_target triggers so fork PRs from external contributors get labeled too (the reusable workflow never checks out PR code); explicit contents:read; pinned v1.4.3. - pre-commit workflow: robust modified-files runner (null-delimited paths, deletion-only PRs handled, deleted paths filtered, no undocumented -r flag, cache keyed on config hash). - flake8 args quoted correctly (the flow-scalar form split at commas and silently reduced the select list). - hooks pinned to .github v1.4.3. TRI-1100
|
Closing: the team is moving away from centralized org-level configuration in favor of per-repository self-contained setups (see triton-inference-server/server#8897 for the first decentralized implementation). Branch retained for reference. TRI-1100 |
What does the PR do?
Aligns this repository with the org-wide setup consolidated in triton-inference-server/.github:
.pre-commit-config.yaml: shared baseline hooks, conventional-commit message validation (commit-msg stage), and the centralizedadd-licensehook from the org.githubrepository (rev: v1.4.3— excludes.github/templates, never rewrites LICENSE files).conventional-prworkflow (@v1.4.3): validates the PR title against Conventional Commits (hard gate — it becomes the squash-merge commit), derives one human-readable label per distinct type found in the title and all conforming commit subjects (e.g.ci:→CI/CD,feat:→feature,fix:→fix), enforces org-wide label colors/descriptions, detects cherry-picks, and fails if no type is derivable and no type label is assigned.Repo-specific: local issue templates are removed — issues route to the server repository via the org-wide default.
Depends on triton-inference-server/.github#5 (pinned tags current:
v1.4.3— already exist, CI is green).Pros / Cons
Pros
.githubrepo) for hooks, templates, issue routing, and the PR-title workflow — one change propagates everywhere.Cons / risks
.githubrepository (tags are write-once; changes ship as a new tag + rev bump)..githubrepository to remain public.Related Issues / PRs
Related PRs:
Test plan
pre-commit validate-configpasses;pre-commit run --files <PR diff>passes locally with the centralized hooks pinned to the .github branch SHA.v1.4.3exists: the conventional-pr check validates this PR's own title and applies thecilabel.Caveats
Checklist
<commit_type>: <Title>(conventional commit)