Skip to content

[draft] MIP-124 : Validator reward configuration - #124

Closed
apenzk wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
validator-rewards
Closed

[draft] MIP-124 : Validator reward configuration#124
apenzk wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
validator-rewards

Conversation

@apenzk

@apenzk apenzk commented Oct 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

informs how to update the reward rate

MIP-124

@apenzk apenzk changed the title Validator rewards [MIP-125] Validator rewards Oct 2, 2025
@apenzk apenzk changed the title [MIP-125] Validator rewards [MIP-125] Validator reward configuration Oct 2, 2025

@0xmovses 0xmovses left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One ammend, one question. Thank you!

Comment thread MIP/mip-124/README.md
Comment thread MIP/mip-124/README.md

#### Path 2: Automatic Rate Decreases

**When Active**: `periodical_reward_rate_decrease_enabled()` is **TRUE** (future system)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this be preferred? (After Governance is enabled?)

@apenzk apenzk Oct 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

either path is ok imo. do you have an intuition which one would be better?

Comment thread MIP/mip-124/README.md
@areshand

areshand commented Oct 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Since MIP is to get feedbacks on the reward from community, do we also want to talk about what the reward rate is ? or how is it set?

@apenzk apenzk changed the title [MIP-125] Validator reward configuration [MIP-124] Validator reward configuration Oct 14, 2025
0xmovses added a commit to movement-network/aptos-core that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
### Description 

Based on [MIP-124](movement-network/MIP#124).

Implements this changes:
https://www.notion.so/movementlabs/Staking-reward-using-GGP-28118675b2d780848e30c0c7e51d47cc

### Testing 

In the folder `aptos-move/framework/aptos-framework` run `movement move
test` to run all test.
Or `movement move test -f stake `to run stake related tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: musitdev <philippe.delrieu@free.fr>
0xmovses added a commit to movement-network/aptos-core that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Based on [MIP-124](movement-network/MIP#124).

Implements this changes:
https://www.notion.so/movementlabs/Staking-reward-using-GGP-28118675b2d780848e30c0c7e51d47cc

In the folder `aptos-move/framework/aptos-framework` run `movement move
test` to run all test.
Or `movement move test -f stake `to run stake related tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: musitdev <philippe.delrieu@free.fr>
0xmovses added a commit to movement-network/aptos-core that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2025
Based on [MIP-124](movement-network/MIP#124).

Implements these changes:

https://www.notion.so/movementlabs/Staking-reward-using-GGP-28118675b2d780848e30c0c7e51d47cc

In the folder `aptos-move/framework/aptos-framework` run `aptos move
test` to run all test.
Or `aptos move test -f stake `to run stake related tests.

---------

See the #227 original PR

---------

Co-authored-by: musitdev <philippe.delrieu@free.fr>
@apenzk apenzk changed the title [MIP-124] Validator reward configuration [draft] MIP-124 : Validator reward configuration Nov 26, 2025
- Add APR vs APY section with formulas and continuous compounding limit
- Update all examples to use 9.53% APR for 10% APY target
- Remove duplicate definitions and consolidate configuration sections
- Clarify motivation vs abstract sections
@apenzk
apenzk requested a review from 0xmovses November 26, 2025 08:40
@apenzk
apenzk requested a review from areshand November 26, 2025 08:40
- Replace LaTeX notation with code blocks and Unicode symbols
- GitHub markdown doesn't support \[ \] or \( \) math syntax
@apenzk apenzk closed this May 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants