Add 2.541.x line, remove 2.504.x line - #6198
Conversation
|
@dduportal @MarkEWaite Do you guys have any insight as to where the errors are coming from? |
|
This looks like an issue with caching the artifacts. cc @lemeurherve |
|
Thanks for the checking @alecharp! |
|
Thanks for the heads-up @alecharp @krisstern, will take a closer look when possible. I've restarted a build without ACP meanwhile. |
|
@shalinisudarsan @krisstern FYI the error is not related to ACP. From https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Tools/job/bom/job/PR-6198/4/pipeline-overview/?start-byte=5081031&selected-node=22#log-22-1112 which ran without ACP:
|
Can you post the actual error the next times please? It could be quite helpful, especially since builds are cleaned up afterward: the previous logs may not be available later. |
|
Note that JUnit test failures are normally preserved in GH Checks even after the Jenkins build has been deleted. Failing |
I know it's no proof but running the command that failed on the build locally worked just fine. |
The later doesn't prevent the former 😉 Having the error logs (or at least an extract) directly in a bug report is more useful than just stating that "it doesn't work": less back and forth, more efficient for everyone.
In retrospect, also a detail (what has been checked) that could have been interesting to mention in the bug report or first comments 🙂 |
|
Sorry, did not have time to look closer at the error yet. Do you mind opening an helpdesk issue if you feel it's an infra problem? |
|
I merged the master branch into the pull request and added some additional changes to make the pull request better match with the pull request that added 2.528.x. I did not drop the 2.504.x line (yet), though I think that should be part of this pull request before it is marked as ready for review. |
We had nothing more than the "cannot resolve artefact ..."
I came later on this subject. I could only test the situation after the fact. |
@lemeurherve Sure, but the error relevant stack trace was really long |
FWIW, here is what I would have expected to be reported from https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Tools/job/bom/job/PR-6198/3/: |
|
@lemeurherve I am seeing the following in the CI/CD output now: Error outputpct-ssh-steps-plugin-2.516.x: error in 'sh' step pct-JiraTestResultReporter-plugin-weekly / Checks if running on a Unix-like node Error in isUnix step.Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing script returned exit code 1 Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing script returned exit code 1 Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing Required context class hudson.Launcher is missing script returned exit code 1 script returned exit code 1 |
From the full console log of https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Tools/job/bom/job/PR-6198/9/ searching for "[ERROR]" I saw this: DetailsAlso a lot of "Agent was terminated". I restarted a build. Maybe the branch should be updated, idk. If you encounter another error that you think is related to the infrastructure itself, can you open an helpdesk please? |
|
Yes, sure! |
fc02fa3 to
332da9b
Compare
|
Hi @MarkEWaite @lemeurherve any ideas on the latest batch of errors? |
|
First investigation shows that we need a new release of the sbt plugin to fix the issue discovered in pull request: |
|
@lemeurherve I think there may be a bug on GitHub, as I checked locally there shouldn't be any merge conflicts remaining |
Maybe but I doubt it.
One more time, please try to put more details in your issue reports. |
|
I've resolved the merge conflicts. The issue with the tests of the |
|
I realised I was probably was confused about why I needed to commit the removal of the 2.504.x pom.xml file, rebased, and re-removed it again... |
|
I am seeing something regarding the Java JDK version which is causing the remaining 4 plugin test failures: [2026-01-15T18:20:45.897Z] Rule 1: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireJavaVersion failed with message:
[2026-01-15T18:20:45.897Z] Detected JDK /opt/jdk-17 is version 17.0.17 which is not in the allowed range [21,). |
|
@krisstern because for example jenkinsci/ssh-steps-plugin#181 (comment) |
|
Thanks @jglick! Appreciate it |
|
Is there anything I should do regarding the remaining three plugins with failures? |
We need a new release of the parameter separator plugin that uses the plugin parent pom that is currently on its master branch. The latest release of the plugin used plugin pom 6.2105.v7d6ddb_2da_0d2 and that has a known problem with the plugin BOM and Java 17. @jonesbusy could you label one of the already merged pull requests as "developer" or "enhancement" or "bug" and start the GitHub action to release a new version? |
The same seems to apply to coverage plugin and gitea-checks plugin. @uhafner will need to release a new version of coverage plugin and @viceice will need to release a new version of the gitea-checks plugin. I'm not sure if a new release of the analysis-pom will be required for those plugins. @uhafner manages the configuration of the analysis-pom. |
|
I released https://github.com/jenkinsci/coverage-plugin/releases/tag/2.3120.v73353a_97726e. I hope it will work without analysis-pom changes. |
Add profile for latest release version 2.541.1
Follows the same pattern as prior pull request: * jenkinsci#5713 Testing done: `LINE=2.541.x PLUGINS=git-client TEST=InjectedTest bash ./local-test.sh`
…7d081847a_ (jenkinsci#6249) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ci#6250) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…83935f9b_ (jenkinsci#6251) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…enkinsci#6252) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
08998ea to
9637fde
Compare
…update-jenkins-version-to-2.541.1
|
released https://github.com/jenkinsci/gitea-checks-plugin/releases/tag/603.621.vc708da_fb_371d |
…update-jenkins-version-to-2.541.1

Added 2.541.x line, and removed 2.504.x line
Follows the same pattern as prior pull request:
Testing done
LINE=2.541.x PLUGINS=git-client TEST=InjectedTest bash ./local-test.shSubmitter checklist
Link to relevant issues in GitHub or JiraEnsure you have provided tests that demonstrate the feature works or the issue is fixed