Skip to content

[MOVED] feat(kms): Add Transit key inspection clients#12134

Closed
nevzheng wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
nevzheng:codex/kms-api-03-transit
Closed

[MOVED] feat(kms): Add Transit key inspection clients#12134
nevzheng wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
nevzheng:codex/kms-api-03-transit

Conversation

@nevzheng

@nevzheng nevzheng commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Moved to Gravitino Enterprise: datastrato/gravitino-enterprise#900. Apache issue #12131 is now limited to the provider-neutral API/SPI and named-source routing.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add separate OpenBao Transit and HashiCorp Vault Transit providers using typed HTTP request and response objects, pooled HTTP clients, token-file authentication, strict endpoint configuration, and normalized key properties.

Missing keys, rejected authentication, malformed responses, and unavailable services remain distinct outcomes.

Why are the changes needed?

Transit provides an open, locally testable implementation of the common KMS contract while allowing OpenBao and Vault integrations to evolve independently.

This work is now tracked in datastrato/gravitino-enterprise#900. The Apache OSS foundation remains #12132 and #12133.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Yes. It adds the openbao-transit and vault-transit KMS APIs and their source properties.

How was this patch tested?

  • ./gradlew :bundles:transit:check -PskipITs

Migration

@nevzheng

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Hi @roryqi and @asdf1234 — please review this KMS API change (3/11). Previous: #12133. Next: #12135. Epic: #12131.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Coverage Report

Overall Project 67.94% +0.04% 🟢
Files changed 72.35% 🟢

Module Coverage
aliyun 1.72% 🔴
api 48.25% +0.43% 🟢
authorization-common 85.96% 🟢
aws 42.04% 🟢
azure 2.47% 🔴
catalog-common 9.92% 🔴
catalog-fileset 79.74% 🟢
catalog-glue 66.91% 🟢
catalog-hive 79.4% 🟢
catalog-jdbc-common 45.7% 🟢
catalog-jdbc-doris 81.72% 🟢
catalog-jdbc-mysql 79.33% 🟢
catalog-jdbc-postgresql 83.39% 🟢
catalog-jdbc-starrocks 79.16% 🟢
catalog-kafka 77.01% 🟢
catalog-lakehouse-generic 59.18% 🟢
catalog-lakehouse-hudi 79.1% 🟢
catalog-lakehouse-iceberg 85.86% 🟢
catalog-lakehouse-paimon 84.23% 🟢
catalog-model 77.72% 🟢
cli 44.5% 🟢
client-java 78.27% 🟢
common 51.95% 🟢
core 82.67% -0.41% 🟢
filesystem-hadoop3 77.28% 🟢
flink 0.0% 🔴
flink-common 47.09% 🟢
flink-runtime 0.0% 🔴
gcp 14.12% 🔴
hadoop-auth 68.0% 🟢
hadoop-common 12.7% 🔴
hive-metastore-common 53.4% 🟢
iceberg-common 64.65% 🟢
iceberg-rest-server 74.91% 🟢
idp-basic 86.02% 🟢
integration-test-common 0.0% 🔴
jobs 66.17% 🟢
lance-common 20.67% 🔴
lance-rest-server 64.84% 🟢
lineage 53.02% 🟢
optimizer 83.24% 🟢
optimizer-api 21.95% 🔴
server 85.92% 🟢
server-common 76.12% 🟢
spark 28.57% 🔴
spark-common 46.01% 🟢
tencent 69.84% 🟢
transit 90.75% 🟢
trino-connector 40.29% 🟢
Files
Module File Coverage
api KmsApi.java 100.0% 🟢
KmsClient.java 100.0% 🟢
KmsReference.java 100.0% 🟢
KmsAuthenticationException.java 0.0% 🔴
KmsClientFactory.java 0.0% 🔴
KmsConfigurationException.java 0.0% 🔴
KmsKeyProperties.java 0.0% 🔴
core KmsConfig.java 100.0% 🟢
KmsClientRegistry.java 98.88% 🟢
GravitinoEnv.java 20.93% 🔴
transit OpenBaoTransitKmsKeyProperties.java 100.0% 🟢
TransitKeyData.java 100.0% 🟢
TransitReadKeyResponse.java 100.0% 🟢
VaultTransitKmsKeyProperties.java 100.0% 🟢
OpenBaoTransitKmsClient.java 97.3% 🟢
OpenBaoTransitKmsClientFactory.java 91.23% 🟢
VaultTransitKmsClientFactory.java 91.23% 🟢
TransitApiClient.java 90.22% 🟢
TransitReadKeyRequest.java 83.33% 🟢
VaultTransitKmsClient.java 82.35% 🟢
FileTokenSupplier.java 81.48% 🟢

@nevzheng nevzheng changed the title [#12131] feat(kms): Add Transit key inspection clients [MOVED] feat(kms): Add Transit key inspection clients Jul 22, 2026
@nevzheng

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Moved to datastrato/gravitino-enterprise#900 under enterprise epic #899. Apache OSS scope remains #12132 and #12133 under #12131.

@nevzheng nevzheng closed this Jul 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant