This essay critiques how university marketing, rankings, and promotional narratives may perpetuate epistemic violence by silencing plural knowledges, urging institutions to recognise their fiduciary epistemic duties and adopt inclusive practices.

Elo rate top universities. Create your own university rankings.

A comprehensive R-based analysis and visualization of the World University Rankings dataset. Explore global trends, key ranking factors, and country comparisons with advanced EDA, statistical modeling, and interactive visualizations. Reproducible and research-focused.

199 universities × 15 countries × 6 dimensions. Independent rankings, public data only, CC-BY 4.0. Methodology by BrightKey, edited by Priscilla Han.

Track and visualize university ranking trends across QS, THE, and ARWU (2003-2027). Interactive charts with 4,300+ universities.

排名雷达 Ranking Radar — 3,790+ universities across QS, U.S. News & Times Higher Education on one timeline. Live-sourced, FAIR, open data.

Report on Times Higher Education by Peter Kahl (Lex et Ratio Ltd, 2025). Examines structural conflicts of interest in THE’s rankings, journalism, and consultancy. Highlights epistemic clientelism, opaque convening, and the need for transparency, structural separation, and fiduciary openness.

Automated scraping and analytics of global university rankings data.

Power BI report analyzing QS World University Rankings (2025→2026) — star schema, 29 DAX measures, 592 universities across 73 countries, 5-page interactive report.

Analytics and scenario modelling of global university rankings using Python, and public higher education datasets.