Repository navigation
ci: repin ci-workflows to v0.36.0 #91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file is sync-managed; this edit will be silently reverted and shouldn't be hand-made here.
.claude/rules/pr-body-contract.mdis listed as a managed destination path in this same repo's.github/workflows/pr-check-managed-files-hosted.yml(line 41), which watches exactly "the sorted union of every sync target's managed destinations" for hand-edits. Per that workflow's own header (lines 3–18), this file is distributed frommelodic-software/standards(components/.../pr-body-contract-ruleper thechore: sync standards components (#88)commit, 3842583, that introduced thev0.34.0wording this PR is now editing), and per ADR-0007: "a managed file is byte-exact with its standards source; the fix path is a standards change, never a downstream edit."Concretely: this PR's edit here isn't durable. The next
standards-syncPR will overwrite this line back to whatevermelodic-software/standardscurrently has — if that source still saysv0.34.0, this repin is reverted on the next sync; if the source has already moved on, this hand-edit is redundant. Either way, the three other files this PR correctly updates (pr-automerge-dependabot.yml,pr-require-checks.yml) are genuinely repo-owned (noSYNC-MANAGED FILEbanner, not on the guard's path list), so the PR's own claim that "sync-managed callers move separately through the standards repin and sync" is true for those but inconsistently applied here — this file should have been excluded from this PR and the version bump made in themelodic-software/standardscomponent instead.Note:
pr-check-managed-files-hostedis advisory during soak (not aggregated intoci-status), so this won't block the merge, but it is a real process violation worth fixing before merge rather than after a sync silently clobbers it.