Skip to content

docs: close out 2026-10-08 (Web identity sign-in merged and deployed) - #458

Merged
bbingz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/closeout-20261008-web-identity
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

bbingz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/closeout-20261008-web-identity

Conversation

@bbingz

@bbingz bbingz commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Closeout for 2026-10-08: PR #457 (Web sign-in from Tailscale Serve identity headers, phase 1) merged as 1e3b5c34 and deployed to the HQ receiver.

  • CHANGELOG.md: new top entry with the merge (one swift-unit flake rerun), the remote-server-main-1e3b5c34-20261008 package and its local identity-mode smoke, the receiver plist change (new binary; +ENGRAM_REMOTE_WEB_AUTH/VIEWERS/EDITORS, -*_CREDENTIAL), the 04:07:31 UTC restart, the Serve-origin verification from the Daily Mac and HQ, and the T+10 receiver check.
  • MEMO.md: matching Chinese digest lines.
  • Design doc status: Accepted; phase 1 merged and deployed, phase 2 not started.

Docs only; no code or configuration in the repository changes.

Validation

CHECKS_RUN: none required for docs; the deployment evidence is in the entry (health, logs, ledger counts, verification output).
CHECKS_NOT_RUN: none.

…oyed to HQ)

Records the merge of PR #457, the swift-unit flake rerun, the
remote-server-main-1e3b5c34-20261008 package, the HQ receiver plist change
and restart, the Serve-origin verification from the Daily Mac and HQ, and
the T+10 receiver check. Design doc status set to Accepted.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-08T04:20:27.955888Z a16eefc PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a16eefc004

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread MEMO.md
Comment on lines +7 to +8
- [合并] PR #457(Web 以 Tailscale 身份登录,第一阶段)以普通合并进 main(`1e3b5c34`);`swift-unit` 因采集器启动时序偶发失败一次,重跑通过。
- [部署] HQ receiver 切到包 `remote-server-main-1e3b5c34-20261008`(verify-only 通过,本地回环身份模式冒烟通过);plist 已备份,环境变量加 AUTH/VIEWERS/EDITORS、删两项口令;04:07:31 UTC 重启,1.5 秒内健康 200,新 PID 98581。回滚:恢复备份 plist 并 bootstrap,旧包保留。详见 `CHANGELOG.md`。

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Reconcile the stale phase-one status

These new entries say phase 1 was merged and deployed, but the same 2026-10-08 memo still states on line 14 that it is uncommitted, unmerged, and undeployed. Unlike the detailed changelog, that older bullet has no “at the time of writing” qualifier, so readers using MEMO.md as the daily digest receive two incompatible current states; update or qualify the stale bullet as part of this closeout.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@bbingz
bbingz merged commit 0e1de67 into main Oct 8, 2026
29 of 33 checks passed
@bbingz
bbingz deleted the docs/closeout-20261008-web-identity branch October 8, 2026 05:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant