Description of pixie rmq#57
Conversation
Malkovsky
commented
Jul 2, 2026
- Proper description of RMQ algorithms
- Removed junk academic staff
- Improvements of RMQ internals
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #57 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.83% 89.21% +0.38%
==========================================
Files 28 30 +2
Lines 8033 8465 +432
Branches 1323 1370 +47
==========================================
+ Hits 7136 7552 +416
- Misses 502 512 +10
- Partials 395 401 +6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@codex please review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bc687653aa
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ | |||
| /.quarto/ | |||
| /_extensions/ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Restore the tracked ACM Quarto extension
With this ignore entry, the commit also removes the tracked academic/_extensions/quarto-journals/acm tree, but the existing paper projects still have _extensions -> ../../_extensions symlinks and use format: acm-pdf (for example academic/papers/algorithms_for_excess/paper.qmd:38). In a fresh checkout those symlinks are broken, so rendering the ACM papers can no longer resolve the required Quarto extension; keep the extension tracked or stop pointing the papers at it.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.