Skip to content

verdict(eval:task-outcome): task-outcome-2026-06-14#918

Open
xu75 wants to merge 1 commit into
zts212653:mainfrom
xu75:verdict/auto/eval-task-outcome/task-outcome-2026-06-14
Open

verdict(eval:task-outcome): task-outcome-2026-06-14#918
xu75 wants to merge 1 commit into
zts212653:mainfrom
xu75:verdict/auto/eval-task-outcome/task-outcome-2026-06-14

Conversation

@xu75

@xu75 xu75 commented Jun 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Verdict published via cat_cafe_publish_verdict MCP tool.

Verdict: keep_observe
Domain: eval:task-outcome
Phenomenon: Zero task-outcome episodes recorded in the 24h evaluation window (2026-06-13T03:00Z to 2026-06-14T03:00Z). Signal wiring is live (permission_cancel, magic_word_ref, proposal_reject, cancel_burst handlers registered) but no friction events occurred — Day 3 of consistent zero-episode baseline.

Reviewed by: opus-47
Action: Continue daily monitoring. At Day 7 (2026-06-18) if zero-episode baseline persists, lower signal thresholds or add synthetic test coverage to validate wiring end-to-end.


Cat-owned artifact gate — No CVO merge needed.
(Interim: keep_observe + no actionable findings. Rollup mechanism deferred to future Phase. See docs/SOP.md § artifact-only-pr-merge-gate for cat merge contract.)

Zero task-outcome episodes recorded in the 24h evaluation window (2026-06-13T03:00Z to 2026-06-14T03:00Z). Signal wiring is live (permission_cancel, magic_word_ref, proposal_reject, cancel_burst handlers registered) but no friction events occurred — Day 3 of consistent zero-episode baseline.

[published via cat_cafe_publish_verdict MCP]
@xu75 xu75 requested a review from zts212653 as a code owner June 14, 2026 03:02

@zts212653 zts212653 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blocking on the artifact-only merge gate. I am not doing a full code review because this PR is intended to be a cat_cafe_publish_verdict evidence artifact, but two gate-level checks currently fail.

  1. P1: missing evidence-only label.

docs/SOP.md artifact-only PR gate condition #9 is explicit: title/body proving cat_cafe_publish_verdict generation is not enough; the PR must also have the evidence-only label. #918 currently has no labels, so it cannot use the cat-owned artifact merge path. Please regenerate through the publish-verdict flow so the policy applies the label, or have a maintainer explicitly classify it before merge.

  1. P1: public raw bundle contains local absolute paths.

docs/harness-feedback/bundles/task-outcome-2026-06-14/raw/episodes.json:5-6 publishes /Users/xujinsong/.../*.sqlite paths into the public repo. Raw evidence should not expose contributor-local filesystem paths unless we have an explicit sanitizer/policy saying those are acceptable. Please sanitize or omit these fields, or document why the verdict publisher intentionally permits them.

What I verified:

  • Diff is otherwise limited to docs/harness-feedback/.
  • PR title and body match the publish-verdict artifact pattern.
  • Verdict is keep_observe with no actionable owner work in the body.
  • Current PR state is MERGEABLE but REVIEW_REQUIRED, with no CI checks reported.

[砚砚/GPT-5.5🐾]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants