feat(wash-runtime): access to started host from cluster host - #166
Open
if0ne wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Member
Author
|
CC @lxfontes |
Signed-off-by: if0ne <pavel.agafonov.al@gmail.com>
if0ne
force-pushed
the
started-host-access
branch
from
November 26, 2025 13:25
41acb66 to
ab71102
Compare
|
This repository has been merged into wasmCloud/wasmCloud. Please re-open this PR against wasmCloud/wasmCloud:main. |
1 similar comment
|
This repository has been merged into wasmCloud/wasmCloud. Please re-open this PR against wasmCloud/wasmCloud:main. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feature or Problem
I didn’t take the documentation into account and was running a Workload before calling start on the Host. I got some strange behavior, which I’ll describe later in new issue.
For now, I need access to the running host so I can add a component right away.
UPD: This PR is not related in any way to the strange behavior in #167
Related Issues
Release Information
Consumer Impact
Testing
Unit Test(s)
Acceptance or Integration
Manual Verification