Skip to content

chore(deps): Update text to 0.39.0 - #333

Merged
wnevis-cmyk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wnevis/updateGoDeps
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): Update text to 0.39.0#333
wnevis-cmyk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wnevis/updateGoDeps

Conversation

@wnevis-cmyk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Fixes vulnerability thrown by Trivy

@wnevis-cmyk
wnevis-cmyk requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2026 19:45
@socket-security

socket-security Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedgolang.org/​x/​text@​v0.38.0 ⏵ v0.39.077 +1100100100100

View full report

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@wnevis-cmyk, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 57 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fbb0d7db-7dd5-4242-8ef0-756e96806976

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33d0926 and c490d96.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch wnevis/updateGoDeps

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@wnevis-cmyk
wnevis-cmyk merged commit 80a0879 into main Aug 13, 2026
10 checks passed
@wnevis-cmyk
wnevis-cmyk deleted the wnevis/updateGoDeps branch August 13, 2026 19:53
danielpanzella added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2026
Resolved conflicts:
- api/v1/weightsandbiases_conversion_overrides.go: combine main's #319 change
  (mapPerAppLegacyOverrides hard-fails when a version is set but its manifest
  can't resolve) with our added `namespace` param for private-registry
  credential resolution in the conversion webhook.
- go.mod/go.sum: kept the higher golang.org/x/* versions (pulled by the ambient
  cloud-keychain deps, which satisfy #333's x/text bump); reconciled with go mod tidy.
- Updated #319's new conversion tests to the 4-arg SetConversionManifestGetter
  signature (added *serverManifest.RegistryAuth).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants