Skip to content

feat: Add implementation for headless scenario - #44

Open
mateolis03 wants to merge 2 commits into
vtex-apps:masterfrom
ITGlobers:master
Open

feat: Add implementation for headless scenario#44
mateolis03 wants to merge 2 commits into
vtex-apps:masterfrom
ITGlobers:master

Conversation

@mateolis03

@mateolis03 mateolis03 commented Dec 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What problem is this solving?

These changes add support for headless implementations, it add new optional fields on the schema to avoid the use of the store-front permissions in a mandatory way, those fields mock the ones fetched originally from the store-front permissions, and also new validations are set in to identify when the requests are sent from a native environment or a headless one.

How to test it?

Workspace

Screenshots or example usage:

image

How does this PR make you feel? 🔗

Cat

@vtex-io-ci-cd

vtex-io-ci-cd Bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi! I'm VTEX IO CI/CD Bot and I'll be helping you to publish your app! 🤖

Please select which version do you want to release:

  • Patch (backwards-compatible bug fixes)

  • Minor (backwards-compatible functionality)

  • Major (incompatible API changes)

And then you just need to merge your PR when you are ready! There is no need to create a release commit/tag.

  • No thanks, I would rather do it manually 😞

@mateolis03 mateolis03 changed the title Add implementation for headless scenario feat: Add implementation for headless scenario Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants