Repository navigation
Add multiple LVM storage classes per host - #3
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
QEMU end-to-end validation completed for this change:
Recorded in |
Contributor
Author
|
Added the client-facing storage-class discovery request:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds first-class storage classes so one kouja agent can serve multiple LVM backends on the same physical host, for example NVMe, SSD, and HDD pools.
storage.classesconfig mapping class names to LVM volume groups.EffectiveVGs.storage_classto the agentCreateVolumerequest,Volume, andCapacityprotobuf messages.class(andstorageClassalias).vgremains supported.GetCapacitynow filter by storage class, so a PVC lands only on a host advertising that class.KoujaVolumePlacement.Compatibility
Existing callers that pass only
vgcontinue to work. If a class is not configured on the agent, it falls back to the raw VG name.Test plan
go test -tags=unit ./...go test -tags=integration ./test/integration/...go test -tags=e2e ./test/e2e/...go test -tags=csi_sanity ./test/csi/...make coverage-check(80.8%)go vet ./...golangci-lint run