-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Add "off" time using Dean #71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
calufa
wants to merge
5
commits into
feature/add-unit-test-suite
Choose a base branch
from
feature/add-off-time-dean
base: feature/add-unit-test-suite
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is the query performance using
EXPLAIN:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just pushed an more performant alternative, here is the result from
EXPLAIN:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple thoughts:
I think more states should be included (i.e. ERROR state, no?) - shouldn't it just be every state except RESPONDING and OFF?
This either assumes everyone only answers one survey or just creates off events for every survey the user ever answered? I like the latter. But there is an issue where if someone is technically in a particular form, but never responded. They will then be able to respond and complete the form later, even if the survey is off (no good!) -- but the off time, being something that is survey-specific (not form-specific), we don't need the actual surveyid. We can use the shortcodes in the state to get all the surveys that the person ever took and do the same thing (or just get the LAST shortcode, already available as
current_form, and use that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure.
The implementation is based on our convo where we only mention
QOUTandBLOCKED, https://curiouslearning.slack.com/archives/D02CDGM9DQB/p1640828961004900?thread_ts=1640792174.000200&cid=D02CDGM9DQB, but I am happy to include all the others exceptRESPONDINGandOFF.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, it requires some decision-making, but that's a trivial change to make later so I'm not overly concerned if we don't get it right on the first try. My instinct is to make more offs rather than less offs at first though!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(NOT moving to OFF state when the survey is off seems to me like an exception and we can solve that problem as we see it become a problem)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added
ERRORandWAIT_EXTERNAL_EVENT, see e2efd91