Skip to content

docs(experimental): demonstrate table-first luVS benchmarks - #3019

Open
ibgreen-openai wants to merge 4 commits into
codex/luvs-clustering-landingfrom
codex/luvs-benchmark-landing
Open

docs(experimental): demonstrate table-first luVS benchmarks#3019
ibgreen-openai wants to merge 4 commits into
codex/luvs-clustering-landingfrom
codex/luvs-benchmark-landing

Conversation

@ibgreen-openai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Goals

Add an opt-in interactive browser benchmark for table-backed exact and approximate GPU similarity search.

Changes

  • Embed a real WebGPU benchmark in the existing conceptual luVS reference.
  • Compare independent CPU exact, GPU exact, filtered GPU exact, and IVF-flat search.
  • Report upload/index-build timing, fenced query latency, candidate counts, reusable index bytes, and recall@K.
  • Preserve server-rendering safety, explicit device creation, Float32-equivalent tie handling, and real-browser coverage.
  • Add release notes for fixed-size GPU table columns, Arrow ingestion, and luVS.

Previously reviewed as #2950. Merge after clustering and IVF reach master.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 38dfc85c10

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread website/src/components/docs/luvs-benchmark-runtime.ts Outdated
Comment thread website/src/components/docs/luvs-benchmark.tsx Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants