Refactor learning engine to V2: weighted keyword matching and scenario-aware evaluation - #46
Open
ananya092302 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Refactor learning engine to V2: weighted keyword matching and scenario-aware evaluation#46ananya092302 wants to merge 2 commits into
ananya092302 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does:
changeLog.md
Rewrites the core learning engine (
learningEngine.js) to fix incorrect concept mapping and make evaluation context-aware.Problem
The V1 engine used flat
.includes()matching on a single keyword list. Common words like "store" and "value" triggered incorrect concepts (lists and dictionaries) even when the learner was clearly describing a variable assignment. The engine also had no awareness of what the active scenario actually expected.Changes
learningEngine.js
.includes()for accurate matchingData storagerule for variable-related reasoningsessions.js
Docs
Testing
Tested locally against the Bag Weight Label scenario. Verified that typing "I will store the value in x" now correctly maps to variables instead of lists/dictionaries.