Repository navigation
fix(fix): rerun a session's failing test files once before rejecting its edits (UPT-111) - #238
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…its edits (UPT-111) On dms-saas a known MongoMemoryServer flake (private-admission.test.ts) failed the end-of-session check in all four SDK sessions, so every edit was discarded. Before the gate rejects a session on test failures, the new failing test files run once more, alone, with their runner and the full run's isolation (TestOptions.only). A file that passes is recorded as flaky (llm.tasks[].flaky, PR review list) and the edits stay; one that fails twice still rejects; a failure naming no test file is never rerun. Final verification keeps its full gate and names flaky files that fail there. Feedback rounds also stop when what is left of maxCost is below the mean cost of the run's sessions so far (llm.feedback.stopped). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas Braum <lucasbraum@gmail.com>
Merged
lucasbraum
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2026
This PR was opened by the [Changesets release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and publish to npm yourself or [setup this action to publish automatically](https://github.com/changesets/action#with-publishing). If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated. # Releases ## uptide@0.16.0 ### Minor Changes - [#237](#237) [`717468a`](717468a) Thanks [@lucasbraum](https://github.com/lucasbraum)! - `npx uptide fix` gets the Agent SDK executor. The package stays as small as before: `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk` is not installed with Uptide. An SDK installed next to Uptide is used as it is; otherwise the first `fix` that needs it installs the version Uptide is tested with into Uptide's cache (`~/.cache/uptide/agent-sdk/<version>`), says so in one line with its size, and later runs reuse it. When that install fails (offline, a proxy) or the SDK cannot run, `fix` runs the patch executor and says so on the first line of its output and at the top of the PR body, with the reason and how to get the SDK executor. `report.json` records `llm.executor` and, after a fallback, the reason in `llm.sdkMissing`. The privacy notice names the SDK only when the SDK will run, and the LLM line names the executor. `--agent sdk` without a usable SDK stops before any work instead of failing mid-run. - [#239](#239) [`e1e8c40`](e1e8c40) Thanks [@lucasbraum](https://github.com/lucasbraum)! - `uptide fix` runs only with the Claude Agent SDK; if it can't, it doesn't run. Before the first download, an interactive terminal asks once: `uptide fix needs the Claude Agent SDK (about 300 MB, downloaded once to <cache>). Download now? [Y/n]` (default yes). With `--yes`, or without a terminal, it downloads and says so in one line. Once cached, it never asks again. Answering `n`, an SDK that can't be fetched or loaded (offline, a proxy, no binary for the platform), a missing `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`, another provider, or `llm.enabled: false` / `executor: patch` in `uptide.yml` all stop `fix` with exit 2 before any clone or spending. The run prints one message with the reason and the fix, and `--json` returns it as `error.code: "SDK_UNAVAILABLE"`. There is no fallback to the patch executor anywhere: the Uptide Action stops the run with the same message. `--no-llm`, `--agent` and `--provider` are gone from help and docs. `llm.sdkMissing` is gone from `report.json`, and `uptide init` no longer writes `executor`. ### Patch Changes - [#236](#236) [`9b35b9d`](9b35b9d) Thanks [@lucasbraum](https://github.com/lucasbraum)! - A repository build that fails on the final head is no longer published as a ready PR. When it fails, `fix` builds the parent commit in the same clone to compare. If the parent fails too, the build line says "already failing before this upgrade" and nothing is blocked. If the parent passes, the upgrade broke the build: verification fails, and the PR opens only as a draft with "Build broken by this upgrade" at the top. If the parent can't be checked out, installed or built, verification still fails and the PR says "Build fails on this upgrade; the parent build could not be checked" with the reason, never that the parent passed. The GitHub Action opens these runs as draft PRs, the same way it opens agent-led runs. The head build also skips workspaces already built on that head, so a workspace whose output a consumer reads is no longer built twice. - [#233](#233) [`1ad8071`](1ad8071) Thanks [@lucasbraum](https://github.com/lucasbraum)! - The PR description's build check now gives the build's actual result: passed, failed with its first error, or not run and why. When a migration pack doesn't require a build, `fix` still runs the repository's build once on the final head, and `uptide verify` runs it again, and reports what happened. "Not required by the pack" now appears next to that result instead of replacing it. Before, the line read "build not required" even when the repository's build failed. A build the pack doesn't require still doesn't block verification or publishing. - [#238](#238) [`6f07d3f`](6f07d3f) Thanks [@lucasbraum](https://github.com/lucasbraum)! - An SDK session's edits are no longer thrown away because of one flaky test. Before the gate rejects a session on test failures, it runs the failing test files once more, alone, with their runner and the same isolation as the full run. A file that passes then is recorded as flaky (`llm.tasks[].flaky` in `report.json`, and a line in the PR body's review list) and the edits stay. A file that fails twice still rejects them, and a failure that names no test file (a build, a timeout) is never rerun. Final verification keeps its full gate: it runs the flaky files again, and if one fails there, verification fails and the PR body says so. `fix` also stops starting verification feedback sessions when what is left of `--max-cost` is below the mean cost of the run's sessions so far, so it no longer starts a session it can't afford; the PR's feedback line says when this happened. - [#234](#234) [`066deab`](066deab) Thanks [@lucasbraum](https://github.com/lucasbraum)! - `fix` on npm no longer loses a package the repo imports without declaring it when the ERESOLVE retry re-resolves the lockfile. If the retry drops such a package from the top of `node_modules`, it runs again keeping that package and the locked packages that require it at their old versions; if that conflicts, the first retry stands. Either way the summary and the PR body name the package under "Imported but not declared" and suggest adding it to package.json. `fix` never adds it for you. Co-authored-by: uptide-release[bot] <338861287+uptide-release[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
UPT-111. On dms-saas, the known MongoMemoryServer flake (
private-admission.test.ts) failed the end-of-session check in all 4 SDK sessions, so every edit was discarded. The #237 pilot got 0/51 coverage, 10 type errors, and spent $1.02 on a $1 cap.What changes
sdk-agent.ts,judge).llm.tasks[].flakyinreport.jsonand the edits stay.TestOptions.onlyinplanTests): with its runner directly,vitest run <files>orjest --runTestsByPath <files>, with the same unit-only isolation as the full run. It never runs atestscript, a fallback, apretest(the first run already built this tree) or the existing unrelated-file retry. A file no runner can take alone (a service test without--with-services, or no runner at all) gets amissingplan, so it can't count as a pass.maxCostis below the mean cost of the run's sessions so far.llm.feedback.stoppedrecords the remaining and typical amounts, and the PR's feedback line says so. In feat(fix): fetch the Agent SDK on the first fix, never fall back silently (UPT-108) #237 the fourth session started with $0.09 left after three sessions at about $0.30 each, crossed the cap, and stopped aterror_max_budget_usd. It would not start now.docs/commands/fix.md. Changeset: patch.Tests
sdk-agent.test.ts, session gate:feedback.test.ts, end to end throughfix:report.jsonand the PR body name the file. If verification's full run fails that file again, verification fails and the body says so; otherwise it passes.services.test.ts: the exact rerun commands for vitest (unit-only config, and with services) and for jest. Atestscript that builds first is skipped, and an e2e file is reported asmissing.pnpm turbo run typecheck testforuptide(517) and@uptide/core(2305) passes.biome check .shows only the pre-existing warning and info.dms-saas rerun
Same harness as #237: #169's bench as the pilot ran it, the packed tarball through plain
npx -y file:<tgz>, the Uptide arm, SDK executor,claude-sonnet-5-5, and the $1 cap (--max-costdefault). One run. The human reference is round 3's.Cannot find package 'vue'from the nested frontend-vue project) are marked preexisting: they fail the same way at the parent.private-admission.test.ts.🤖 Generated with Claude Code