Skip to content

Security: ukladjs/uklad

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

Reporting a vulnerability

Please report suspected vulnerabilities privately through GitHub private vulnerability reporting. Do not open a public issue or pull request for a suspected vulnerability.

A useful report includes the affected package and version, a reproduction or proof of concept, and your assessment of the impact. You can expect an acknowledgement within 7 days. This is a maintainer-run project: fixes are best-effort, and disclosure timing is coordinated with the reporter before anything is published.

Supported versions

The latest published release line of every @ukladjs package receives security fixes. The current coordinated versions are recorded in release.json, and the supported production boundary is documented in docs/production-readiness.md. Reports should name the package version and, when source builds are involved, the tested commit.

Older pre-1.0 lines are not patched after a fixed release is available. Security advisories identify the first fixed version and any required migration.

Uklad is a rebrand of Reflex. The Reflex packages (@flexsurfer/reflex, @flexsurfer/reflex-devtools, @flexsurfer/reflex-devtools-mcp) remain published and in scope; security fixes there land in the latest published version of each package, and older 0.x releases are not patched.

Scope

In scope are the packages built and published from this repository under the @ukladjs scope:

Example applications and private workspace packages are out of scope, but reports about them are still welcome if they reveal a problem in a published package.

Trust model

DevTools is development-only tooling and must not be pointed at production data or exposed to untrusted networks. Its threat model, security defaults (authentication, loopback-only binding, read-only capabilities, redaction, bounded payloads, audit records), and remote-access hardening guidance are documented in the DevTools security model and the MCP bridge README.

Two boundaries documented there are worth restating: loopback binding is a machine/network-namespace boundary, not a same-user boundary, and authentication does not make arbitrary network exposure safe. Reports that assume a deployment which violates the documented trust model (for example, DevTools exposed directly to the public internet) may be resolved as documentation clarifications rather than code fixes.

There aren't any published security advisories