Skip to content
#

formal-proof

Here are 22 public repositories matching this topic...

Formal Proof of the Non-Existence of Perfect Cuboids via Mordell-Weil Rank Exhaustion and Minimal Polynomial Irreducibility of the Perfect Cuboid Surface.

  • Updated Jul 18, 2026
  • Lean

Route C of 4 — Act III Growth. RH via contradiction: |ζ|≤C(log t)² false via Littlewood 1924 Ω exp(c√(log t/log log t)). Zero repulsion c1=0.209>0.2 β>0.9 closed at p5 → S₄={2,3,19,191} C=11.422>2√13 → GRH → H₄ 12/11 → RH. Lean 4.12 0 sorry. Opera Numerorum with A, B, D 35 brothers desert.

  • Updated Aug 24, 2026
  • Lean

ia Collapse Theory and AK High-Dimensional Projection This repository presents Version 2.0 of a formal, categorical, and type-theoretic resolution of the Hodge Conjecture, formulated through Collapse Theory and the AK High-Dimensional Projection Structural Framework (AK-HDPST).

  • Updated Jul 15, 2025
  • TeX

Route A of 4 — Act I Positivity. RH via Arakelov on X₀(143) g=13 ω²=48/13>0 Abbes-Ullmo 1996 → S₄={2,3,19,191} C=11.422>2√13 → GRH M9 → H₄ 12/11 → RH. Lean 4.12 0 sorry riemannZeta. Opera Numerorum with B λ₁≥975/4096, C exp(c√log/loglog), D jitter ||p·α₀||<1/p → R=1/2. doi:10.5281/zenodo.21303944

  • Updated Aug 24, 2026
  • Lean

A formal constructive proof of the Goldbach Conjecture using A-type primes. The theory guarantees every even number ≥4 can be expressed as a sum of two primes, offering a reproducible and extendable number-theoretical foundation. A型素数を用いた構成的手法により、すべての偶数(4以上)が2つの素数の和で表現可能であることを証明。再現性と拡張性を兼ね備えた数論的基盤を提供します。

  • Updated Jun 23, 2025

This repository presents a constructive solution to the Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem, a Clay Millennium Prize topic. The framework confirms the existence of a positive mass gap through verifiable quantum field logic. 本リポジトリでは、クレイ懸賞問題のひとつであるヤン–ミルズ存在と質量ギャップ問題に対し、構成的に正の質量ギャップの存在を示す理論を収録しています。量子場理論に基づき、検証可能な構成を整備しています。

  • Updated Jun 23, 2025

Reproducibility repository for "Non-Compensatory Legitimacy", a formal-computational paper on conjunctive legitimacy conditions in clinical AI governance. Contains the canonical manuscript, a formal-proof directory for the representation-incompatibility result, annotated Jupyter notebooks, and bibliography.

  • Updated May 15, 2026

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the formal-proof topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the formal-proof topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more