Skip to content

ci: add Checkmarx security scan (mobile blueprint) - #1

Merged
alghanor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/align-checkmarx-blueprint
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

ci: add Checkmarx security scan (mobile blueprint)#1
alghanor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/align-checkmarx-blueprint

Conversation

@alghanor

@alghanor alghanor commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds a Checkmarx security scan; the repo had no CX workflow.

Uses the mobile blueprint (unzercorp/tillhub_app_ios):

  • unzercorp/unzer-tech-toolbox/.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml@ci-github/1.6
  • cx_scan_profile: mobile-app, cx_threshold_preset: relaxed, cx_scan_timeout: "30"
  • tillhub-org token: CX_NON_PCI_TH_CORP_CLIENT_ID / _SECRET

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new GitHub Actions workflow to run a Checkmarx One security scan using an external reusable workflow (“mobile blueprint”) so the repository has automated CX scanning on pushes/PRs.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new workflow (Checkmarx Security Scan) triggered on push, pull_request, and manual workflow_dispatch.
  • Uses unzercorp/unzer-tech-toolbox/.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml reusable workflow with mobile-app scan profile and relaxed thresholds.
  • Wires Checkmarx client credentials from repository secrets into the scan workflow.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.


jobs:
security-scan:
uses: unzercorp/unzer-tech-toolbox/.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml@ci-github/1.6
Comment on lines +24 to +25
security-scan:
uses: unzercorp/unzer-tech-toolbox/.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml@ci-github/1.6
@alghanor
alghanor merged commit 50b4cea into main Jul 2, 2026
4 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants