ci: run supply-chain-lint only on .github/ changes; re-sync vendored lint - #74
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…lint [PSEC-5231] Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
laf-rge
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2026
laf-rge
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving supply-chain-lint workflow update.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Follow-up to swan-bitcoin/actions#234, which makes
supply-chain-lintscan the repository's own composite actions under.github/actions/by default (PSEC-5231)..github/**changes. Everything the lint scans lives under.github/, so runs on unrelated PRs produced no signal..github/actions/; with actions#234 that is no longer true.pushandpull_requesttriggers;workflow_dispatchstays for manual runs.supply-chain-lintis not a required status check in this repo (checked the branch rulesets), so the paths filter cannot leave PRs stuck waiting on an expected check.Verification
Ran the re-synced vendored copy against this branch exactly as CI would:
Scanning 1 files... No supply chain violations found.(check-linear-linkscanned; the lint's own directory self-excluded).🤖 Generated with Claude Code