Skip to content

ci: keep CodeQL init/analyze on one SHA and unstick msgpack bumps - #29

Open
sumitake wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/grok/dependabot-ci-traps
Open

ci: keep CodeQL init/analyze on one SHA and unstick msgpack bumps#29
sumitake wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/grok/dependabot-ci-traps

Conversation

@sumitake

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Dependabot opened separate PRs for codeql-action/init and codeql-action/analyze. CodeQL then fails with:

Loaded a configuration file for version '4.37.9', but running version '4.37.8'

That happens on every CodeQL bump unless both uses: lines move together.

This PR:

  • groups all GitHub Actions updates into one Dependabot PR
  • bumps init and analyze to v4.37.9 (cdf488f5)
  • lets validate_repository.py require requirements.txt to match the pyproject msgpack pin (unblocks msgpack 1.2.1 → 1.2.2)

Supersedes #26, #27, and #28.

Dependabot treated github/codeql-action/init and /analyze as separate
dependencies, so each PR loaded config 4.37.9 against analyzer 4.37.8.
Group GitHub Actions updates, bump both pins together, and make the
msgpack audit compare requirements.txt to pyproject.toml instead of a
hardcoded version.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 907ff54f-dc64-4011-a5e0-20318ca1a3ba


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-31T23:22:12.211827Z 0161c29 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0161c29512

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +155 to +157
pinned = re.search(r'"((?:msgpack==)[0-9][0-9.]*)"', pyproject)
if pinned is None or requirement != pinned.group(1):
errors.append("requirements.txt must pin the same msgpack version as pyproject.toml")

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep the documented MessagePack pins synchronized

When the next Dependabot pip update changes both manifests, this check will pass even though Dependabot does not update the exact version literals in THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md:23 and docs/architecture-and-operations.md:233. Those files will consequently continue claiming the old runtime version. Either include those literals in the synchronization check or avoid documenting a duplicated exact version.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant