chore(deps): bump lodash to ^4.18.1 - #2931
Merged
Merged
Conversation
barryadk
previously approved these changes
Apr 8, 2026
|
Hey @dotboris, can you take a look at the errors that came up during the build? |
Contributor
Author
|
I took a quick look and this project is running Line 137 in c29966f I'll go revert the |
Seems like the old version of `typescript` doesn't handle the updated types.
Contributor
|
@dotboris I'm changing the PR name to match the convention.Otherwise LGTM. Thank you for this contribution 👍 |
tomek-tursa-sb
changed the title
tomek-tursa-sb
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2929.
Checklist
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Additional context
I've changed the tilde (
~) versions to be carets (^) so that minor version bumps won't require PRs like this in the future. I figured this was OK because I saw other cases where^was used for lodash.