Repository navigation
Frontend Template Should Have A Method Requiring a Signed Transaction #290
Description
Edit from maintainer team: the frontend template does not have a signed & sent transaction, so the FE code lacks a good example for people to start from. Use this as the problem statement to solve, and update the Guess the Number component appropriately
Hi!
To support continued learning and provide a clear example for the community, what do you think about adding a new method to the GuessTheNumber component that requires a signed transaction?
I think it would be very beneficial to have a method that requires a signature, as it would demonstrate how to reuse the scaffolding's main utilities (like the hooks and context) for an authenticated action.
For example, we could add a reset method to the GuessTheNumber component that can only be called with an admin's signature.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks! 🙏
Activity
Chesblaw commentedon Nov 11, 2025
@masch can you assign me?
tupui commentedon Nov 11, 2025
Hi all, can you give a bit more details here about what you are trying to do? The contract has already a function that requires a signature
require_auth.[-]Proposal: GuessTheNumber Contract - Add a Method Requiring a Signed Transaction[/-][+]Frontend Template Should Have A Method Requiring a Signed Transaction[/+]pselle commentedon Nov 11, 2025
@masch I think what you found here is that the frontend repo should have an example of signing and sending a transaction. @chadoh started an effort over here: stellar-scaffold/ui#123, but we're open to someone picking this up since that's only a draft.
I updated the title of this issue and may add a maintainer note on the top of your original issue to make sure we work on this!
masch commentedon Nov 13, 2025
Thank you for take it. I'm available to test it when is ready.
pselle commentedon Nov 13, 2025
@masch Chad marked his PR as ready for review if you want to pull it/test it out and leave your feedback there! stellar-scaffold/ui#123
masch commentedon Nov 14, 2025
I pulled the branch and tested it on my own contract, which requires signed transactions. It's working perfectly.! Thank you!
pselle commentedon Nov 18, 2025
PR is merged! Thanks for helping us test @masch!
masch commentedon Nov 18, 2025
Great! Thanks for taking the suggestion. Do you know when this is scheduled to be released?