-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
Fix InterfaceVillasQueueless signal indexing, read handling, and start-of-sim sync #585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
leonardocarreras
wants to merge
1
commit into
sogno-platform:master
Choose a base branch
from
leonardocarreras:fix/villas-queueless
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I interpret this correctly, this change implies that the InterfaceVillas tries only once, what's the reason for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @pipeacosta! Thanks for the question, is true that is a change on the way we do things. My way of thinking is that queued interface will work in a dedicated thread, so it can retry. And for the queueless, we read in the PreStep, so the simulation will block until we get data in the existing implementation.
I was doing some experiments with the RT mode on DPsim. We gain robustness in some edge cases, reusing the last sample if we have one miss... For some RT experiments, it blocks too long for one single de-sync, or it exits with error... So basically one best effort in reading, if nothing is there, we continue with an old sample instead of exiting with error... It might clash with some behaviour that depends on "new sample arrives, then we run one step", so sometimes will reuse an old sample for the external pacing source...
An intermediate solution would be making this behaviour as selectable option, would that be better in your opinion? We can use the blockOnRead argument for that (this is not implemented in that way currently) so is possible to have either of them
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the explanation. I would stay with the philosophy of trying to keep real-time execution with the queueless interface, and use previous samples if needed. It would be good to log a warning in this case. Having said that, it is not necessary to implement the intermediate solution you mentioned imo.