Add PSY-392-F Contemporary Issues - Wikipedia course page - #18
Draft
smasongarrison with Copilot wants to merge 8 commits into
Draft
Add PSY-392-F Contemporary Issues - Wikipedia course page#18smasongarrison with Copilot wants to merge 8 commits into
smasongarrison with Copilot wants to merge 8 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: smasongarrison <6001608+smasongarrison@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: smasongarrison <6001608+smasongarrison@users.noreply.github.com>
…urse Co-authored-by: smasongarrison <6001608+smasongarrison@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: smasongarrison <6001608+smasongarrison@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: smasongarrison <6001608+smasongarrison@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: smasongarrison <6001608+smasongarrison@users.noreply.github.com>
smasongarrison
marked this pull request as ready for review
December 15, 2025 17:54
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Add page for PSY-392-F course on Wikipedia representation
Add PSY-392-F Contemporary Issues - Wikipedia course page
Dec 15, 2025
smasongarrison
marked this pull request as draft
December 15, 2025 17:57
Owner
|
@copilot why did you list so much of the training on the syllabus? why did you not not look at how the other pages used the scheduler? |
…e training detail Co-authored-by: smasongarrison <6001608+smasongarrison@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
Author
You're right - I included way too much detail from the Wikipedia Education Foundation timeline. I've simplified the syllabus (commit 334c535) to match the concise pattern used in other course pages (0201-0204). The file now:
The detailed Wikipedia training content belongs on the Wikipedia Education Dashboard, not in the course syllabus. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds syllabus for PSY-392-F, a half-semester course (9 weeks) on psychological science representation in Wikipedia, running March-April 2025 with Tuesday/Thursday meetings.
Implementation
0205_wikipedia.Rmdfollowing existing course file conventionscreate_classschedule()with dynamic date generation viaadvdate()Dynamic Date Pattern
All dates generated programmatically, consistent with other course files:
Course Details
Original prompt
This section details on the original issue you should resolve
<issue_title>Can you make a page for my new course?</issue_title>
<issue_description>
PSY-392-F-Contemporary Issues in Psychology - Citation Needed: Psychology, Misinformation, and Wikipedia
How is psychological science represented, simplified, distorted, and contested on Wikipedia, and what does that mean for how people understand psychology?
Guiding Questions:
When does Wikipedia get psychological science basically right, and when does it go off the rails?
How do replication, controversy, and uncertainty show up (or get hidden) in coverage of classic studies and constructs?
What responsibilities do psychologists have, if any, when Wikipedia is a primary source of information about their field?
Wikipedia shapes what millions of people think psychology is. But how much of that knowledge is accurate, oversimplified, outdated, or contested? In this discussion-driven seminar, we use Wikipedia as a lens for understanding how psychological science travels from labs and journals into the public imagination. Students dig into major pages on classic studies, theories, and controversies to see where the science is represented well, where it goes sideways, and why.
Along the way, we examine how replication failures, methodological debates, and scientific uncertainty do (or don’t) surface on a platform that presents itself as neutral and authoritative. We also ask what responsibilities psychologists might have when a crowd-edited encyclopedia becomes the de facto gateway to their field.
Through hands-on critique, research, and editorial contributions, students not only learn the science behind the pages but also see how public knowledge about psychology gets built, negotiated, and sometimes distorted.
And here's the timeline:
Week 1 (03/01 - 03/07)
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.