Django-backend - #1
Conversation
siddharth-krishna
left a comment
siddharth-krishna
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR! This looks great. I have added some comments on how to improve it before we merge the PR in.
Another thing we should add is a README file that explains how to install Django and other dependencies, and how to run the webserver on a laptop to test the website locally. I think we should also add a requirements.txt file and instructions on how to set up a python virtual environment for this project. (See for example https://github.com/etsap-TIMES/times-excel-reader/#development-setup)
| <script src="linenumbers.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script> | ||
| <script src="index.js" type="text/javascript"></script> | ||
| <script src=" {% static 'js/codejar.min.js' %}" type="text/javascript"></script> | ||
| <script src="{% static 'js/codejar.min.js' %}" type="text/javascript"></script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This JS file is being imported twice.
| Generated by 'django-admin startproject' using Django 4.0.5. | ||
|
|
||
| For more information on this file, see | ||
| https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/topics/settings/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When I go to this link, it says "This document is for an insecure version of Django that is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a newer release!". Maybe we should use v4.2?
| # See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/howto/deployment/checklist/ | ||
|
|
||
| # SECURITY WARNING: keep the secret key used in production secret! | ||
| SECRET_KEY = 'django-insecure-zjnqabq%c2lpq$jgg12z8q6foq^q2i94cr02q76&(2stpwn#a8' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should not commit the secret key to a public repo. Let's find out where to store it instead
| SECRET_KEY = 'django-insecure-zjnqabq%c2lpq$jgg12z8q6foq^q2i94cr02q76&(2stpwn#a8' | ||
|
|
||
| # SECURITY WARNING: don't run with debug turned on in production! | ||
| DEBUG = True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similarly, we should set this to False in the repo, and have a way to make it True when we test the website locally.
| <script src=" {% static 'js/codejar.min.js' %}" type="text/javascript"></script> | ||
| <script src="{% static 'js/codejar.min.js' %}" type="text/javascript"></script> | ||
| <script src=" {% static 'js/linenumbers.min.js' %}" type="text/javascript"></script> | ||
| <script type="text/javascript" src="{% static 'js/script.js' %}"></script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This expects script.js to live in static/js/ but this PR moves it to templates/
2 participants
No description provided.