An Agent Skill for designing research intake filters that admit only information likely to change your next action. Most "stay current" workflows fail either by volume (a guilt queue that outruns reading time) or by false-abstinence (reading nothing because sorting feels too expensive). A signal-first filter refuses both: search widely, intake narrowly.
# Copy into your global skills directory
cp -r skills/signal-first-research ~/.claude/skills/signal-first-research/skills add shimo4228/signal-first-research- Define the signal before the search — write down what information would actually change your next action
- Search without source exclusion — no source is filtered upfront; breadth stays intact
- Filter at intake, not at read-time — each item must answer "would this change what I do next?" before it is admitted
- Diagnose the filter periodically — a checklist distinguishes a healthy filter from one that has quietly broken (lazy passthrough, topic creep, guilt backlog)
- You are about to build a recurring research workflow — daily digest, news stream, topic monitor, literature feed
- The default question "what should I read?" keeps producing too much
- An existing digest has become a backlog you skim with guilt instead of acting on
| Failure | Shape | Signal-first answer |
|---|---|---|
| Volume bias | Aggregate everything, trust yourself to skim | Filter lives in the intake question, not in your head |
| False-abstinence | Read nothing; sorting feels too expensive | Breadth is kept; only intake is narrowed |
| Lazy filter | Filter passes everything "interesting" | "Interesting" is not a signal; action-changing is |
The canonical copy of this skill lives in the author's live Claude Code harness. This repository is a one-way publication mirror:
scripts/sync-from-local.sh --dry-run # report differences only
scripts/sync-from-local.sh # apply to working tree (never commits)This skill is a design-pattern skill from the Agent Knowledge Cycle (AKC) research line — a Zenodo-citable six-phase bidirectional growth loop (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19200726) for sustaining intent alignment between an AI agent and its operator over time. It is the "how" counterpart to AKC ADR-0010 Human Cognitive Resource as Central Constraint. AKC is one of three research lines by @shimo4228, alongside Contemplative Agent (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19212118) — autonomous agents grounded in four contemplative axioms — and Agent Attribution Practice (AAP) (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19652013) — harness-neutral ADRs on accountability distribution.
MIT