Skip to content

🧪 testing improvement: Add tests for FieldVector.to_dataframe - #49

Merged
shashi-manikonda merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-83693794783900043-27e02787
Jun 12, 2026
Merged

🧪 testing improvement: Add tests for FieldVector.to_dataframe#49
shashi-manikonda merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-83693794783900043-27e02787

Conversation

@shashi-manikonda

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: FieldVector.to_dataframe() lacked test coverage. This PR adds tests to ensure it correctly constructs a DataFrame representation of the vector using both strictly numeric and MTF variables from sandalwood.

📊 Coverage: Tests handle the basic numerical case with a single-row DataFrame, as well as the multi-row MTF case. The MTF tests verify the order, exponents, and specific coefficients to confirm correct functionality. Exponents logic is robustly parameterized based on mtf._MAX_DIMENSION.

Result: Enhanced test coverage provides confidence that tabular/dataframe representations of field vectors are generated correctly.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 83693794783900043 started by @shashi-manikonda

Added unit tests `test_fieldvector_to_dataframe_numerical` and
`test_fieldvector_to_dataframe_mtf` to `tests/test_vectors_and_fields.py`
to ensure the `to_dataframe` method on `FieldVector` handles both numeric
and Multivariate Taylor Function (MTF) components correctly. Includes
checks for dataframe shape, column names, coefficient correctness, and
zeros padding according to `MAX_DIMENSION`.

Co-authored-by: shashi-manikonda <199693178+shashi-manikonda@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@shashi-manikonda
shashi-manikonda merged commit 489682f into main Jun 12, 2026
0 of 8 checks passed
@shashi-manikonda
shashi-manikonda deleted the jules-83693794783900043-27e02787 branch June 12, 2026 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant