Fix: Ensure correct component is matched during validation - #1
Conversation
The `validateWebsite` function was incorrectly identifying components when one component's name was a substring of another. This was due to the component list not being sorted by length, causing, for example, `<md-icon-button>` to be matched with the `icon` component instead of `icon-button`. This commit sorts the component list by length in descending order before matching, ensuring the most specific component is always chosen. Additionally, the `extractApi` function was corrected to use the 'Attribute' column instead of the 'Property' column from the API documentation, aligning the validation with the actual HTML attributes.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. |
Fix: Ensure correct component is matched during validation
This submission fixes a bug in the component validation logic. The
validateWebsitefunction was incorrectly identifying components when one component's name was a substring of another. This was due to the component list not being sorted by length, causing, for example,<md-icon-button>to be matched with theiconcomponent instead oficon-button. This commit sorts the component list by length in descending order before matching, ensuring the most specific component is always chosen. Additionally, theextractApifunction was corrected to use the 'Attribute' column instead of the 'Property' column from the API documentation, aligning the validation with the actual HTML attributes. A new test case was added to verify the fix.PR created automatically by Jules for task 11059292876308023292 started by @shantoislamdev