Added the ability for equipment, apparel and possessions to be transferrable#2
Open
MianReplicate wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Added the ability for equipment, apparel and possessions to be transferrable#2MianReplicate wants to merge 2 commits into
MianReplicate wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Author
|
updated the PR to fit what was stated in the README |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As this pull request states, this adds the ability for equipment, apparel, and possessions on humanlike to be transferred between the different lists in the editor.
I found it rather strange that you could give humanlike pawns apparel, but not be able to put them on if they were put in the possessions list. This PR fixes that and adds a plus sign as a transfer button between lists.
This has been tested to make sure it saves and loads properly. I haven't had the time to test it in-game properly, but I don't see why it wouldn't work if everything can be parsed correctly in the custom blueprint format.