Use predicate faux type - #87
Open
aartaka wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
There most likely are errors, but the work is significant enough to afford a couple of typos. One significant problem with this patch is that it removes a bit of type information by switching to “predicate” type. In particular, string-related predicates often have a “(lambda ((char? c)) boolean?)” signature, which tells slightly more than a raw “predicate” type. However, uniformity is more important that an obvious type omission.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There most likely are errors, but the work is significant enough to afford a couple of typos.
One significant problem with this patch is that it removes a bit of type information by switching to
predicatetype. In particular, string-related predicates often have a(lambda ((char? c)) boolean?)signature, which tells slightly more than a rawpredicate. However, uniformity is more important that an obvious type omission.@arvyy how does it look?