Skip to content

bump oblast to 0.13.2, gg to 1.12.0 - #405

Open
majewsky wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
gsql
Open

bump oblast to 0.13.2, gg to 1.12.0#405
majewsky wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
gsql

Conversation

@majewsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This moves some types to a different package (oblast/handle -> gg/gsql), so there are a ton of renames that Renovate does not know how to handle. There is nothing in this PR except for the version bumps and renames.

This moves some types to a different package (oblast/handle -> gg/gsql),
so there are a ton of renames that Renovate does not know how to handle.
There is nothing in this PR except for the version bumps and renames.
@majewsky
majewsky requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2026 22:09
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this branch will not change overall coverage

Impacted Packages Coverage Δ 🤖
github.com/sapcc/castellum 0.00% (ø)
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/api 88.85% (ø)
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/tasks 78.33% (ø)
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/test 0.00% (ø)

Coverage by file

Changed files (no unit tests)

Changed File Coverage Δ Total Covered Missed 🤖
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/api/api.go 84.40% (ø) 436 368 68
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/api/operations.go 88.89% (ø) 504 448 56
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/tasks/asset_resize.go 83.33% (ø) 144 120 24
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/tasks/asset_scrape.go 84.62% (ø) 624 528 96
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/tasks/context.go 0.00% (ø) 8 0 8
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/tasks/garbage_collect.go 50.00% (ø) 16 8 8
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/tasks/resource_scrape.go 73.08% (ø) 208 152 56
github.com/sapcc/castellum/internal/test/setup.go 0.00% (ø) 0 0 0
github.com/sapcc/castellum/main.go 0.00% (ø) 0 0 0

Please note that the "Total", "Covered", and "Missed" counts above refer to code statements instead of lines of code. The value in brackets refers to the test coverage of that file in the old version of the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant