Skip to content

Update remote job execution documentation - #1948

Merged
fdevans merged 2 commits into
rundeck:4.0.xfrom
brmdias:patch-23
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

Update remote job execution documentation#1948
fdevans merged 2 commits into
rundeck:4.0.xfrom
brmdias:patch-23

Conversation

@brmdias

@brmdias brmdias commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Removed note about available criteria for remote execution. It was saying that only threadRatio and Load are available but a few lines below it mentionsthreadRatio,load, systemLoadAverage and processors.

Removed note about available criteria for remote execution.
It was saying that only threadRatio and Load are available but a few lines below it mentions`threadRatio`,`load`, `systemLoadAverage` and `processors`.
@brmdias
brmdias requested review from a team and a lite review from Copilot August 31, 2026 13:41

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Rundeck remote job execution documentation by removing an incorrect note about which load-balancing criteria are available, avoiding a contradiction with the criteria list described later in the section.

Changes:

  • Removed the note stating only certain criteria are available, since the page documents additional criteria elsewhere.
  • Leaves the load-balanced execution configuration examples intact.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread docs/administration/configuration/remote-job-execution.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@fdevans fdevans modified the milestones: 6.3.0, 6.2.0 Aug 31, 2026
@fdevans
fdevans merged commit ee67290 into rundeck:4.0.x Aug 31, 2026
3 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants