add network-interface inner-vlan and qinq#392
Merged
Conversation
88e86cc to
296aefb
Compare
Contributor
|
Tested with 2 scenarios:
Its actually 802.1q outer-vlan + 802.1q inner-vlan: 2026-06-13T04:13:24.667910+0000 7a:fa:66:c0:00:01 > 3e:2c:f2:60:31:9e, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 150: vlan 110, p 0, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), vlan 200, p 0, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), (tos 0xe8, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 128) Should we add option for 802.1ad for outer-vlan? We should uniform with other options, if we use qinq in a10nsp its always 802.1ad. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This merge request introduces support for
inner-vlanandqinqon network interfaces. However, it retains the limitation that the outer VLAN must be unique per link. For example, configuring VLAN pairs like100:1and101:2is supported, but configuring100:1and100:2on the same network interface is not allowed.