Skip to content

Add support for the annotated triples syntax - #358

Merged
jeswr merged 6 commits into
rdfjs:mainfrom
rubensworks:feature/annotated-triples
Jun 23, 2023
Merged

Add support for the annotated triples syntax#358
jeswr merged 6 commits into
rdfjs:mainfrom
rubensworks:feature/annotated-triples

Conversation

@rubensworks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The RDF-star spec introduces syntatical suggar for annotating triples: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/editors_draft.html#annotation-syntax

@rubensworks
rubensworks force-pushed the feature/annotated-triples branch from 1d2a4e5 to ddc9c60 Compare June 22, 2023 09:05
@jeswr

jeswr commented Jun 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note that support for this is also added as part of #341; however I am in favor of releasing this as PR as a new minor version - and I will aim to get the next mver out soon.

@RubenVerborgh RubenVerborgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good, just weird that the coverage checker didn't catch some cases.

Comment thread src/N3Lexer.js Outdated
Comment thread src/N3Lexer.js Outdated
Comment thread src/N3Lexer.js Outdated
Comment thread src/N3Lexer.js Outdated
jeswr and others added 3 commits June 22, 2023 23:17
Co-authored-by: Ruben Verborgh <ruben@verborgh.org>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Verborgh <ruben@verborgh.org>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Verborgh <ruben@verborgh.org>
Comment thread src/N3Lexer.js Outdated
Comment thread src/N3Lexer.js Outdated
Comment thread src/N3Lexer.js Outdated
@jeswr
jeswr merged commit eccaeb3 into rdfjs:main Jun 23, 2023
@jeswr

jeswr commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Released as v1.17.0 - thanks @rubensworks !

@jeswr jeswr mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants