Skip to content

Update rancher creation/updating verifications#780

Merged
susesgartner merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
Update-Config-order
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

Update rancher creation/updating verifications#780
susesgartner merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
Update-Config-order

Conversation

@susesgartner

@susesgartner susesgartner commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request updates the verification process for rancher creation and updating, specifically revising the order in which configuration data is written. These changes aim to improve reliability and consistency during rancher setup and modification.

@susesgartner
susesgartner requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2026 21:15
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PASS: The PR title, generated description, and commit message are clear, descriptive, and accurately reflect the work being done. No changes are required.

Updates the order in which the creation, writing to the cattle config and verification functions are run. This is needed due to some bad practice that is buried in our clients which can cause failures if a cattle config is modified without rewriting the updates to the cattle_config file.

fixes

fix
@susesgartner
susesgartner force-pushed the Update-Config-order branch from 259e5c6 to 9dc839a Compare July 24, 2026 21:30
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PASS: The PR title, generated description, and commit message are all clear, descriptive, and consistent. The PR title succinctly indicates an update to rancher creation/updating verifications, the generated description accurately summarizes the work, and the commit message clearly explains the specific change related to configuration write order.

@susesgartner
susesgartner merged commit 2642b4b into main Jul 24, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants