Skip to content

fixing cnot sequence bug from cr - #1627

Draft
lballerio wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cnot_sequence_bug
Draft

fixing cnot sequence bug from cr#1627
lballerio wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cnot_sequence_bug

Conversation

@lballerio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updating CNOT sequence definition using Cross Resonance gate.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.47%. Comparing base (58598a1) to head (515cf1d).
⚠️ Report is 117 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1627      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.45%   91.47%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         151      151              
  Lines       12012    12012              
==========================================
+ Hits        10986    10988       +2     
+ Misses       1026     1024       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.47% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ols/two_qubit_interaction/cross_resonance/utils.py 93.02% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@lballerio
lballerio marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2026 05:47
@lballerio
lballerio requested review from a team July 24, 2026 05:47
@lballerio
lballerio marked this pull request as draft July 29, 2026 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants