reuse same rectangular pulse (unique UUID)

[jevillegasd]

Here I am testing defining just one pulse that is repeated many times (shared UUID?) so that when I run the sweep, I iterate for a shorter range (duration/n, where n is the number of times we repeat the pulse) and hope that this way all the repeated pulses in the sequence are swept, effectively getting a longer range.

This only works for back to back rectangular pulses, but could be extended for pulses with a transition.

In practice this is actually not working and I halt at the same

assert sum(len(w.data) for w in waveforms) <= WAVEFORM_MEMORY

My only guess being that there is no de-duplication based on UUID. The sequence is indeed re-using the UUID, like in

[
    (
        '0/drive',
        Pulse(
            id_=UUID('ceaf44d6-45f8-4090-a1d5-0849410e1b15'),
            kind='pulse',
            duration=40.0,
            amplitude=0.17976076552362769,
            envelope=Drag(
                kind='drag',
                rel_sigma=0.25,
                beta=-0.8877200835178028
            ),
            relative_phase=1.5707963267948966,
            chirp=None
        )
    ),
    (
        '0/drive',
        Pulse(
            id_=UUID('6136982d-43cf-4968-95a4-e9c94e88e7c4'),
            kind='pulse',
            duration=26.0,
            amplitude=0.001,
            envelope=Rectangular(kind='rectangular'),
            relative_phase=0.0,
            chirp=None
        )
    ),
    (
        '0/drive',
        Pulse(
            id_=UUID('6136982d-43cf-4968-95a4-e9c94e88e7c4'),
            kind='pulse',
            duration=26.0,
            amplitude=0.001,
            envelope=Rectangular(kind='rectangular'),
            relative_phase=0.0,
            chirp=None
        )
    ),
    ...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 28.00000% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.27%. Comparing base (b00f190) to head (b13a786).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/qibocal/protocols/coherence/spin_lock.py	28.00%	18 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##           spin_lock_spectroscopy    #1542      +/-   ##
==========================================================
- Coverage                   93.40%   93.27%   -0.13%     
==========================================================
  Files                         137      137              
  Lines                       10809    10830      +21     
==========================================================
+ Hits                        10096    10102       +6     
- Misses                        713      728      +15     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	93.27% <28.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/qibocal/protocols/coherence/spin_lock.py	35.89% <28.00%> (-0.31%)	⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.