Content review: content/docs/iac/concepts/providers/_index.md - #20503
Merged
Conversation
Automated existing-content review. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
pulumi-bot
enabled auto-merge (squash)
July 24, 2026 14:51
Contributor
|
🔍 Triage prose check — possible issues in the diff. Full review is skipped (
This is a simplified spelling/grammar/style check in lieu of a full review. Reject false positives at your discretion. |
Collaborator
Author
|
Your site preview for commit 89261a4 is ready! 🎉 http://www-testing-pulumi-docs-origin-pr-20503-89261a4c.s3-website.us-west-2.amazonaws.com Changed pages: |
CamSoper
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
This PR is set to auto-merge (squash). Once it has an approving review and the required build check passes, GitHub will merge it automatically — approving this PR will merge it. To prevent that, disable auto-merge (or convert the PR back to a draft) before approving.
Why this page
content/docs/iac/concepts/providers/_index.md→ /docs/iac/concepts/providers/no_retire: true)CLICKSTREAM.FCT_PAGEVIEWS)attempts: 0)This section is composed deterministically from the selection queue; do not edit it.
Fixes applied
stack.SetConfigmethod accepts a booleantrueargument to setpulumi:disable-default-providers[0]as a path.SetConfig(ctx, key, val)signature takes nopathargument, so the sample did not compile. Replaced it with the path-aware method:stack.SetConfigWithOptions(ctx, "pulumi:disable-default-providers[0]", auto.ConfigValue{Value: "*"}, &auto.ConfigOptions{Path: true}).providerresource option](/docs/iac/conce…"provideroption to be set).Findings not applied
https://search.opentofu.orglink fetched as a client-rendered shell (title only, no body text), so the source couldn't confirm the framing; the statement is well-corroborated elsewhere on the same page, so this is a citation-target concern for a human, not a factual error.pulumi config set --path 'pulumi:disable-default-providers[0]' awsdisables theawsdefault provider. — unverifiable — Verification did not converge within its turn budget; the CLI example is internally consistent with the surrounding section (and with the verified c59/c60), so there's no evidenced correction to apply.deterministic_fix, so this is a style nag with no Vale-authored replacement; removing "simply" is a prose edit for a human, not a mechanical fix.local_repair, but the proposed fix offers two alternatives and L36 uniquely carries the Azure Native parameterized example (absent from the later section); deciding what to trim without losing that content is editorial.pulumi config set aws:region us-west-2block. —local_repair, but claim c46 treats this command as the config that lands the example's listener inus-west-2; it's meaningful context, so the real repair is adding explanatory prose (authoring), not the deletion alternative.deterministic_fix; rewording "There are two methods…" is a prose judgment.For the judgment-level items above, run
/glow-up content/docs/iac/concepts/providers/_index.md.Screenshot check
No images. The page source references no screenshots, diagrams, or other content images (only the generic shared
meta_imagecard, if any), so there is nothing to verify. (Determined from the source; the screenshot pass was skipped.)Rendered content
Skipped — the page source uses only render-safe chrome (
choosable,chooser,notes), so the rendered HTML and markdown carry no content beyond the source prose (nothing data-sourced or partial-included to fact-check). Nomake buildor rendered pass required. (Determined from the source.)Verification
make lint: ✅make lintre-verified by the workflow on89261a4cf6.verified-claims.json: 66 verdict(s); 1 contradicted/mismatch, 3 unverifiable.vale-findings.json: 6 finding(s).readthrough-findings.json: ran=True, 3 finding(s).frontmatter-validation.json: 1 file(s); 0 alias collision(s)