Skip to content

weborama rtd submodule update doc to reflect fix in appnexus integration for v8 - #4655

Merged
bretg merged 5 commits into
prebid:masterfrom
Weborama:update-weborama-rtd-submodule-doc-fix-appnexus
Jul 6, 2023
Merged

weborama rtd submodule update doc to reflect fix in appnexus integration for v8#4655
bretg merged 5 commits into
prebid:masterfrom
Weborama:update-weborama-rtd-submodule-doc-fix-appnexus

Conversation

@peczenyj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🏷 Type of documentation

  • update bid adapter
  • new examples

📋 Checklist

This PR depends on this intermediate development - already released on v7.53.0 :
#4647

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jun 19, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for prebid-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c5df154
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/prebid-docs-preview/deploys/64a68fbab3778900087ef961
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4655--prebid-docs-preview.netlify.app/dev-docs/modules/weboramartdprovider
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@bretg

bretg commented Jun 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@peczenyj - please fix merge conflicts. Thanks.

@peczenyj peczenyj changed the title update doc to reflect fix in appnexus integration for v8 weborama rtd submodule update doc to reflect fix in appnexus integration for v8 Jun 30, 2023
@peczenyj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@peczenyj - please fix merge conflicts. Thanks.

done

@bretg bretg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@peczenyj - thanks for the update. Looking over this doc from a publisher's perspective, I'd like to know if there's a big difference from how you configure this module in 7.x vs 8.x. If so, I think the parameter tables and the example section needs to more clear about the differences.

You've listed several params as "deprecated", which is good, but I think that might need to be clearer since many publishers will continue to use 7.x for quite a while. i.e. please consider updating the wording so it says "use this in 7.x" or "use this in 8.x".

@peczenyj

peczenyj commented Jul 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@peczenyj - thanks for the update. Looking over this doc from a publisher's perspective, I'd like to know if there's a big difference from how you configure this module in 7.x vs 8.x. If so, I think the parameter tables and the example section needs to more clear about the differences.

You've listed several params as "deprecated", which is good, but I think that might need to be clearer since many publishers will continue to use 7.x for quite a while. i.e. please consider updating the wording so it says "use this in 7.x" or "use this in 8.x".

Hello

I think we will omit some details for a while. There is still a debate about what will be really deprecate on this module

thanks

@bretg bretg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok - thanks. Next issue -- formatting. Take a look at the preview of your page at https://deploy-preview-4655--prebid-docs-preview.netlify.app/dev-docs/modules/weboramartdprovider

Your tables are missing this line:

{: .table .table-bordered .table-striped }

Please add this just before each table.

@bretg
bretg merged commit 2feee85 into prebid:master Jul 6, 2023
ecdrsvc pushed a commit to ecdrsvc/prebid.github.io that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
…ion for v8 (prebid#4655)

* update doc to reflect fix in appnexus integration for v8

* simplify docs

* add format to tables
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants