You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Omitting x, y coords to test edges: drop in accuracy after 40 epochs
Best model so far (accuracy 96%):
runs/3d374601-MED_650.0-NN_50-MPPL_5000-UMIC_True-AETP_True-features_range-azimuth-elevation-z-DBZH-TH-VRADH-RHOHV-PHIDP-centered_x-centered_y-DBZH_isna-TH_isna-VRADH_isna-RHOHV_isna-PHIDP_isna/in-GC_16-RELU-GC_2-mean-out-Conv1+Conv2+Conv3/LR_0.005-BS_512-SEED132/1,[150,300],0.5
By varying graph size (num_nodes) between 1,10,50 I see larger graphs outperforming smaller ones:
Varying the maximal_edge_distance (MED) is less conclusive for some single cases a very low value (3) seems to work slightly better but an other seed does not show the same result: