Skip to content

Zul'Farrak: pull the pair before the camp, with approach points (r2-19z19 step 26 wipes); generic approach-clearance check - #281

Merged
pjerra merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/zf-antusul-order
Oct 21, 2026
Merged

pjerra merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/zf-antusul-order

Conversation

@pjerra

@pjerra pjerra commented Oct 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Round 2 on 19z19: the Zul'Farrak run wiped twice at step 26 (the camp at 1666.77 903.85). Cause (PLAN-ZF-STEP26): the changed route pulled the camp before the pair [5648,7247] standing between the party and the camp; the camp step had no approach row, so the run leader stopped 30 yd short (15.4 yd from the pair's 5648) and the pair aggroed during the walk. Fix: antusul order = Witch Doctor 1633.3 868.3, the pair (patrol block kept), the camp, the north pack, as in the 19z16 clear; approach points 1620 880 z 8.97 (pair) and 1630 878 z 8.93 (camp), navmesh floors. New check internal/dungeon/approach_clear_test.go: a pull's stand (last approach point, or 30 yd short of the group centre from the previous group) must stay 20 yd from later groups (23 computed, 3 yd drift) and 15 yd from patrol paths; it FAILS on the old order (mutation proof) and fails only for the two guarded Zul'Farrak groups, other findings (other plans, 31 more in Zul'Farrak) are report-only and not fixed. Reviews: Opus cold review (SHIP). KNOWN LIMITS (from the review, not fixed here): (1) the 155626 patrol still passes the camp: with DungeonRunPullStand on, the camp pull's firing stand lands about 1.6 yd from the patrol path, so the 19.6 yd figure holds only for the approach point; cause 2 of the step 26 wipes (the patrol) needs module support for patrols; (2) the north pack's stand is 9.2 yd from the patrol path (report-only); (3) creatures in no group are not checked. Zerillis (10082) stays in the skip lists (agent-led driver only; the exporter drops skip lists, so no module row changes).

… approach-clearance plan check (r2-19z19 step 26)
@pjerra
pjerra merged commit 23383b5 into dev Oct 21, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant