-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 360
Allow label scoped resources in POLICIES_STRING_REGEX #7178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Goyamjain06
wants to merge
6
commits into
pipe-cd:master
Choose a base branch
from
Goyamjain06:fix/7172-rbac-label-regex
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2731258
Allow label scoped resources in POLICIES_STRING_REGEX
Goyamjain06 ce7d41d
Tighten POLICIES_STRING_REGEX label block to reject semicolons and em…
Goyamjain06 249855a
Merge branch 'master' into fix/7172-rbac-label-regex
khanhtc1202 47c5292
Merge branch 'master' into fix/7172-rbac-label-regex
rahulshendre dbd7216
Merge branch 'master' into fix/7172-rbac-label-regex
rahulshendre 20dd7ac
Exclude whitespace from RBAC policy label pairs to prevent newline in…
Goyamjain06 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | ||
| import { POLICIES_STRING_REGEX } from "./project"; | ||
|
|
||
| describe("POLICIES_STRING_REGEX", () => { | ||
| it.each([ | ||
| "resources=*;actions=*", | ||
| "resources=application;actions=get", | ||
| "resources=application,piped;actions=get,list", | ||
| "resources=application;actions=get,list,create,update,delete", | ||
| ])("matches policy without labels: %s", (policy) => { | ||
| expect(POLICIES_STRING_REGEX.test(policy)).toBe(true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Regression test for https://github.com/pipe-cd/pipecd/issues/7172 | ||
| // Label scoped resources (resources=NAME{key:value}) were rejected by the | ||
| // form validation even though parseRBACPolicies/formalizePoliciesList | ||
| // already supported them. | ||
| it.each([ | ||
| "resources=application{env:prod};actions=get", | ||
| "resources=application{env:prod,team:foo};actions=get", | ||
| "resources=application{env:prod},piped;actions=get", | ||
| "resources=application{env:prod},piped{env:prod,team:foo};actions=get,list", | ||
| ])("matches policy with label scoped resources: %s", (policy) => { | ||
| expect(POLICIES_STRING_REGEX.test(policy)).toBe(true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it.each([ | ||
| "resources=application{env:prod;actions=get", // unclosed brace | ||
| "resources=bogus;actions=get", // unknown resource type | ||
| "resources=application;actions=bogus", // unknown action | ||
| "resources=application", // missing actions | ||
| "resources=application{a=b;c:d};actions=get", // semicolon escapes the label block | ||
| "resources=application{};actions=get", // empty label block | ||
| "resources=application{env:pr\n\nod};actions=get", // newline injection in label value | ||
| ])("does not match invalid policy: %s", (policy) => { | ||
| expect(POLICIES_STRING_REGEX.test(policy)).toBe(false); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you add
resources=application{a=b;c:d};actions=getandresources=application{};actions=getto the invalid cases once the pattern is tightened? these are the cases where form validation andparseRBACPoliciescurrently disagreeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added both cases to the invalid-policy test list —
resources=application{a=b;c:d};actions=getandresources=application{};actions=get— and confirmed the full suite still passes (50 suites / 185 tests) with all existing valid/invalid cases intact.