Skip to content

stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-08-29 12:02:45 - #6122

Closed
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260829_120241-jkytyf
Closed

stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-08-29 12:02:45#6122
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260829_120241-jkytyf

Conversation

@hongyunyan

@hongyunyan hongyunyan commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Added trailing whitespace to the build configuration file with no functional impact.

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Aug 29, 2026
@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-light

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign wk989898 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-light

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-heavy

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 29, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 25cda7a2-864e-47c4-9e4b-4d5bbed237bd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51db518 and b89a382.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Makefile gains two blank lines after the check-next-gen-grafana target. No build, test, lint, target, or variable behavior changes.

Changes

Makefile whitespace

Layer / File(s) Summary
Trailing blank lines
Makefile
Two empty lines were added after the check-next-gen-grafana target. No target logic or variable definitions changed.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to b89a3

This is a clearly localized Makefile-only change, and no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: wk989898, lidezhu

Poem

A rabbit found two spaces bright
At Makefile’s quiet end of night
No targets changed, no tests took flight
The blanks now rest in perfect light
Hop, hop—whitespace feels just right

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description states the automated stability-test purpose and the Makefile change, but it omits most required template sections, including the issue reference, change details, test checklist, compat… Use the repository template. Add an issue line in the format "Issue Number: close #..." or "Issue Number: ref #..."; describe the Makefile change; identify the applicable tests, including the requested stability tests; answer the performanc…
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title identifies the automated stability-test purpose and date, so it is related to the pull request. It does not clearly state that the main change is an empty line in the Makefile.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description states the automated stability-test purpose and the Makefile change, but it omits most required template sections, including the issue reference, change details, test checklist, compatibility and documentation answers, and release note.

Resolution

Use the repository template. Add an issue line in the format "Issue Number: close #..." or "Issue Number: ref #..."; describe the Makefile change; identify the applicable tests, including the requested stability tests; answer the performance, compatibility, and documentation questions; and set the release note to "None" if no release note is required.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.

@hongyunyan hongyunyan closed this Aug 29, 2026
@hongyunyan
hongyunyan deleted the stability-test-20260829_120241-jkytyf branch August 29, 2026 11:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant