Skip to content

stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-08-29 10:02:21 - #6120

Closed
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260829_100218-annnbv
Closed

stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-08-29 10:02:21#6120
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260829_100218-annnbv

Conversation

@hongyunyan

@hongyunyan hongyunyan commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved Makefile formatting by adding a trailing blank line.

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-light

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Aug 29, 2026
@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign nongfushanquan for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-light

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-heavy

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 29, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 18de7cff-6923-4ce7-9272-37d8d6df60e4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51db518 and 637b5aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Makefile adds a trailing blank line after the check-next-gen-grafana target. No target behavior or exported declaration changes.

Changes

Makefile Formatting

Layer / File(s) Summary
Target spacing
Makefile
Adds a blank line after the check-next-gen-grafana target.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 637b5

This change only adds an empty line to the Makefile and does not alter product behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: lidezhu, wk989898

Poem

A rabbit checks the Makefile line
One blank line makes the spacing fine
No commands hop, no targets change
The tiny patch keeps layout strange
Then bounds away through syntax clear

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description states the basic purpose but does not follow the required template. It omits the issue number, change details, test checklist, compatibility and documentation answers, and release note… Complete the required template sections. Add an issue reference, describe the Makefile change, identify the applicable test status, answer the compatibility and documentation questions, and add a release note or None.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title identifies this as an automated non-next-generation stability test and matches the pull request objective.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description states the basic purpose but does not follow the required template. It omits the issue number, change details, test checklist, compatibility and documentation answers, and release note.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hongyunyan: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cdc-storage-integration-light 637b5aa link true /test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hongyunyan hongyunyan closed this Aug 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant