Skip to content

stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-08-29 06:01:31 - #6116

Closed
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260829_060127-ncybmy
Closed

stability-test-non-next-gen - 2026-08-29 06:01:31#6116
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260829_060127-ncybmy

Conversation

@hongyunyan

@hongyunyan hongyunyan commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Added a trailing blank line to improve Makefile formatting.
    • No functional behavior changed.

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Aug 28, 2026
@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-light

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign nongfushanquan for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-light

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-heavy

@hongyunyan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 28, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 05128934-8f5a-4107-bcb7-a293fa5451f7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51db518 and 70117e2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Makefile now ends with a blank line after the check-next-gen-grafana target. No functional behavior changed.

Changes

Makefile formatting

Layer / File(s) Summary
Trailing blank line
Makefile
Adds a blank line after the check-next-gen-grafana target without changing target behavior.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 70117

This PR only adds an empty line to the Makefile and does not change product behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: wk989898, lidezhu

Poem

A rabbit found the Makefile’s end,
And added space for lines to mend.
No targets changed, no commands ran,
Just one small blank line joined the plan.
Hop, hop—the file is neat again!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description states the basic change, but it does not follow the required template. It omits the required issue number, change details, test checklist, compatibility and documentation answers, and … Add the required template sections. Include an issue reference, explain the Makefile change, identify the applicable test option such as "No code," answer both questions, and provide a release note or "None."
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title identifies this as an automated non-next-generation stability test and includes its timestamp. It matches the pull request objective, although it does not mention the Makefile change directl…
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check

Explanation

The title identifies this as an automated non-next-generation stability test and includes its timestamp. It matches the pull request objective, although it does not mention the Makefile change directly.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description states the basic change, but it does not follow the required template. It omits the required issue number, change details, test checklist, compatibility and documentation answers, and release note.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hongyunyan: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy 70117e2 link true /test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hongyunyan hongyunyan closed this Aug 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant