Add critical evaluation report of the website tutorials - #80
Open
pedroliman wants to merge 14 commits into
Open
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #80 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.39% 95.39%
=======================================
Files 40 40
Lines 1955 1955
=======================================
Hits 1865 1865
Misses 90 90 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this adds
A critical evaluation of the website tutorials, written from the perspective of the target reader (a health economics and outcomes research modeler at the graduate level or beyond), under
devdocs/tutorial-evaluation/.Approach
eval-<name>.md), each judging the page on purpose and audience fit, pedagogy and concept introduction, writing againstdevdocs/guidance/writing_style.md, correctness (numbers re-run against the installed package), and where the page sits in the sequence.README.md) that synthesizes the per-tutorial findings and adds the cross-cutting analysis that only surfaces when the pages are read as a set: where a concept is introduced relative to where it is first used, whether the pages link into a coherent path, and where they repeat or contradict each other.Headline cross-cutting findings
Status
Work in progress. The overall report and several per-tutorial evaluations are in; the remaining per-tutorial files are being committed as the reviews finish, and the verdict table and a correction note are updated as they land.
Generated by Claude Code