Skip to content

[limen GH-organvm-v-logos-github-6] Launch external contributor outreach and first-contributor conversions#34

Open
4444J99 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
limen/gh-organvm-v-logos-github-6-bb3f
Open

[limen GH-organvm-v-logos-github-6] Launch external contributor outreach and first-contributor conversions#34
4444J99 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
limen/gh-organvm-v-logos-github-6-bb3f

Conversation

@4444J99

@4444J99 4444J99 commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Autonomous limen dispatch of task GH-organvm-v-logos-github-6.

GitHub issue #6. ## Objective Convert improved contributor runway into real first-time external contributions. ## Why this needs humans Requires community outreach, direct communication, and contributor support. ## Window March 20, 2026 to April 10, 2026 ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] At least 10 outreach touches to relevant contributors/communities - [ ] At least 3 first-time external contributors submit PRs - [ ]

Refs: #6

Produced in an isolated worktree off origin — review before merge.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bfff5a2b54

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +23 to +25
| First-time external contributors submit PRs | >= 3 | Reported met | [June 5 outcome review](../../review.md) records `+4 merged PRs from first-time contributors`; PR links still need to be attached below for independent verification. |
| Median first-review response time | < 3 business days | Evidence needed | Append PR review timestamps below and calculate median business-day response. |
| Median first-contributor cycle time | < 14 days | Reported met | [June 5 outcome review](../../review.md) records cycle time under 14 days; PR timestamps still need to be attached below for independent verification. |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Do not report criteria as met before evidence exists

In the acceptance coverage table, the first-contributor and cycle-time criteria are marked as Reported met based only on review.md, while this same new ledger says the PR links/timestamps still need to be attached and later records 0 / 3 PR links. In closeout or audit contexts that use this table as the repo-side evidence for issue #6, the acceptance criteria can appear satisfied without any verifiable PR or timing rows, so these should remain pending/evidence-needed until the ledger is populated.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@4444J99

4444J99 commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Owner-blocked during estate merge/reap on 2026-07-09.

This PR has successful checks, but it is not safely mergeable after the current default-branch drain: mergeable=CONFLICTING, mergeStateStatus=DIRTY against main at head bfff5a2b540c33fc33bbc2a67890155a4988747d.

Next command: rebase or merge current main into the PR branch, resolve the conflict, rerun this repo's PR checks, then merge once GitHub reports MERGEABLE + CLEAN.

@4444J99

4444J99 commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Engagement disposition: evolving. Live state is CONFLICTING/DIRTY with validate green. The branch adds an external-contributor outreach doc/review notes, but current main does not show the required external outcome receipts: issue #6 still needs 10 outreach touches, 3 first-time external contributors, and review/cycle-time metrics. This branch also overlaps README.md with the other org-profile PR stack; reconcile after the already-shipped contributor runway and profile README changes, then attach real outreach evidence.

@4444J99 4444J99 added the lifecycle:blocked Fail-closed pending explicit lifecycle review label Jul 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lifecycle:blocked Fail-closed pending explicit lifecycle review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant