WIP: Alpine and basic IPv6 - #2
Conversation
FRR zebra might have some advantages, but I don't see that we actually need them. FRR also has support for Alpine, so it might be an option to use that later.
| done | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| if [ -n "$BGP_IPV6" -o "$BGP_IPV6" = yes ]; then |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The condition evaluates to true for BGP_IPV6=no (which is probably not intended).
Also -n $x is always true when $x = foo this "or" makes no sense.
| ## 1.6.0 / 2018-xx-xx | ||
|
|
||
| * Switch to Alpine for smaller images | ||
| * Switch to Quagga or Zebra deamon |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Might be a good idea to add a note regarding zapi version change from 4 to 3. Last time I had trouble with version < 4 with gobgp.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Zebra protocol version 4 seems to specific to the FRR version. The "original" Zebra seem to support only 0 and 1, while Quagga adds version 3.
The only reason I changed this to Quagga is that there a Alpine packages for Quagga. FRR has been working on Alpine packages as well, but they are somewhat WIP (https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/commits/master/alpine).
It might make sense investigate if the FRR apline packages can be integrated instead of the Quagga ones.
2 participants
No description provided.